Thought for the Dazed

I've had to give up that Distance Learning course as I was having trouble seeing the teacher.

Flickr
www.flickr.com
RobMiles' items Go to RobMiles' photostream
Twitter
C# Yellow Book

Search entire site
« Imagine Cup Game Development Competition Entries Close on Monday | Main | Platform 2010 Free Games Conference at Hull »
Thursday
Mar112010

Alice in Wonderland Movie Review

4423111002

I like the bar in Cineworld

Alice in Wonderland the movie is a Tim Burton realisation of the story, as paid for by Disney. It doesn’t tell a Lewis Carol version but dials things on a bit to send Alice back down the rabbit hole in search of the Vorpal sword to kill the Jabberwocky or some such rubbish(very impressed with the spell checker here – it seems to know the word Jabberwocky).

The plot is actually a bit thin and you can almost hear them checking things off as we go through the film. Blue caterpillar – check,  Mad Hatter – check, Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum – check, Cheshire Cat – check, all though we’ll call him Chess to make it seem a bit more modern.  Johnny Depp as the Mad Hatter is a highlight, played as for Willy Wonka with a different hairstyle, no chocolate to speak of. And a hat.

I quite liked the film. It was in 3D, which made a difference to the price but didn’t add much else for me. I wonder if one day they might do an experiment, where they turn the 3D effect off for an audience and see if anyone notices. I doubt they will ever do this though, as they might find out that nobody does.

In fact, I’ll put on my gadget pundit hat at this point and say that I don’t think 3D will ever really catch on.  This is not just because, with my dodgy eyes, I can’t actually see in 3D, but rather because we don’t really need it. Sure there will be set pieces like Avatar where the effect is very well integrated into the production, but if you had said to me last night “Two quid off the price to watch in normal 2D” I would have taken the money like a shot.

3D in the home sounds even more unlikely. Having to put on dorky glasses to get the full benefit of Question Time in 3D seems a pretty fruitless exercise, and I’m not really up to spending a huge wodge of cash on upgrading my TVs again just for that. And apparently in the wrong hands the effect can make you more than a bit seasick. Maybe I’m wrong here, but bearing in mind that we haven’t even got High Definition TV yet (which is worth the money by the way) then I think 3D will be a long time coming.

Reader Comments (1)

I saw Alice in Wonderland last Monday, I didn't expect much from the film but it wasn't that bad. Maybe a bit too much violence for a +12 Year Old film.


3D is only a way to make more money (here in Portugal we pay 2 euro for the glasses and in the end we have to return then, what a ripoff)

So far only two films were worth to see in 3D, Beowulf and Avatar, but as you sayed, big production films spent more money on the effects.



BTW I'm looking forward to see you in Techdays again ;)
March 12, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMiguel Pereira

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.